Author: latepaul

Categories
book reading reviews

Whispers Under Ground – Ben Aaronovitch

So book 3 in the Rivers of London (or PC Grant, opinions differ) series. It felt like a long wait before I got to read this. It was 3 books and 14 days. But all those books were perfectly fine (all 7s) and two weeks isn’t that long.

So we’re back with Peter Grant, Lesley May and Inspector Nightingale. Lesley is now also training to be a wizard (or a ‘practitioner’). Like the previous two books Whispers Under Ground has its own story – the mysterious death of an American art student at Baker Street tube station. Also like the previous books there’s more of an ongoing element. This time I suppose you could say it stretches back as well as forward.

I did really enjoy this book, but not quite as much as the other two. Whether that has anything to do with the fact that it took me a couple of weeks to read it – which was about being tired a lot not about the writing – I don’t know. It does have the trademark humour but either I’m getting used to it or the one-liners are less zing-y than they were. Also the separation between the story-of-this-book and the unfolding narrative is more clear cut. I guess that in book 1 that’s almost accidental because as events occur and discoveries are made you have no way to know whether it’s connected to the current story because you don’t really know until the end that some of it will carry on to the next book. However I also think the on-going story is given more time here. I think in two or three books time it will be the story of that book.

I think I enjoyed those elements more. Getting drip-fed more details about Nightingale’s past is tantalizing and the ‘Faceless Man’ is an intriguing villain. Also I think that the ‘A plot’ involves a lot of running around tunnels and sewers and under the ground generally and it didn’t grab me as much as the other stuff. I like the ‘nazareth’ though.

So now there is a long wait – June! – for book 4 to be published. And I believe book 5 has at least been commissioned. Lots of stuff on the TBR pile to be catching up with in the meantime.

8/10 – our favourite wizard ‘going underground’.

Speaking of TBR it currently stands at 252 down from 253 which is obviously good. The currently reading list is standing still at 10 but I hope to knock that down soon.

Categories
Accidental Diet diet L3 lesamy Less is More

The Accidental Diet – Week 11 (ish)

(technically Week 10.6!)

So I said I needed to make a change and this is at least part of it – move my official weigh-in and (blogging) day to Friday. This works well for a couple of reasons – first Friday morning immediately after Thursday which is a fast day, is usually my lowest point. It was last week and it was again this morning. Second, since I only fast two days a week I have a run of 3 non-fast days over the weekend. So Monday’s fast, even with the exercise, is not always enough to make up for anything I might have gained.

Now just switching to Friday and getting a “low” reading isn’t what’s making me happy on its own. It’s the fact that this time last week I was 268.2 and so not only am I down on Monday’s figure but I’ve lost real weight over the week.

I’ve stopped logging my “normal” exercise in MFP and I’m considering setting my daily calorie target based on my old regime[*] but I haven’t really changed anything that I’m doing food or exercise wise – so that’s good because it means I haven’t “stalled”. The thing that had me down on Monday was the idea that I would have to get more radical to keep losing and that that would lose me the one great advantage of IF – sustainability.

Lost: 2.2lbs
Lost so far: 16lbs
Average Weekly Loss: 1.45lbs
Weight: 267.2lbs (19st 1lb)

Created by MyFitnessPal – Nutrition Facts For Foods

[*]basically take my old diet of 1800-cals a day plus a bit more a weekends, work out the weekly total and subtract 1200 (2 x 600 for the fast days). Subtract another 1000 (2×500 for 2 less walks a week). Divide the result by 5 and that will give me the total for non-fast days. This would be a total total and any exercise I do can be logged for interest but not ‘eaten back’. That would then give me the calorie equivalent of my old diet – which worked for as long as I could keep it up – but in an IF style, hopefully easier to stick to.

Categories
Accidental Diet diet L3 lesamy Less is More

The Accidental Diet – Week 10

Well I’m a little down on last week but over two weeks I’m slightly up. I have been further down (268.2) during the week and I keep saying I’m ok with day-to-day fluctuations but.. what this looks an awful lot like is maintaining. Unfortunately I’m still 3 stone heavier than my target at which I might possibly want to start maintaining.

So, I may need to make a change. I’ve been using MFP’s calorie calculations as a guide to what to eat on non-fast days, which in turn is based on losing a pound a week but with all my exercise (including walking to work and lunchtime strolls to the shops) counted. Maybe what I need to do is stop counting those bits of exercise I used to do before. Maybe I need an extra fast day. Maybe I need a couple of non-fast days to be low-ish (e.g. 1800cals like my old diet).

I’m not rushing to judgement. I’m going to think about it until Friday. That’ll be one week from my last lowest weigh-in.

Lost: 0.2lbs
Lost so far: 13.8lbs
Average Weekly Loss: 1.38lbs
Weight: 269.4lbs (19st 3lb)

Created by MyFitnessPal – Nutrition Facts For Foods

Categories
book reading reviews

Old Man’s War – John Scalzi

I did two things on my seventy-fifth birthday. I visited my wife’s grave. Then I joined the army.

Isn’t that a great way to open a book? Intriguing, it draws you in. I guess there’s nothing in it that isn’t implied by the book’s title but still, I like it.

I read Old Man’s War because I got it as part of the humble bundle back in October and Sword and Laser were doing it for their January pick. I confess the later reason was less important. My record with online book clubs is not great. When I do manage to finish the book in time I often read what’s already been discussed and don’t have much to add. When I do post something often there’s no reply. But I did find it interesting to see what others thought.

Old Man’s War is the story of John Perry who, as we’ve read, enlists on his 75th birthday. The army he enlists with is the Colonial Defence Force and involves him leaving earth, and his former life – he becomes legally dead, behind. The CDF recruits exclusively from 75-year-olds and there are rumours of rejuvenation technology, which is why so many enlist. The truth is slightly more disturbing.

The book follows John through the process step by step – leaving earth, initial induction, the treatment, military training, military campaigns. In fact for the first third of the book it’s pretty much one thing after another rather than a plot per se. Then there’s a section when we get to see John and the CDF battling various alien threats. This seemed mostly just to illustrate the variety of aliens and how they need to adapt tactics to fight them. The final section has something more of a plot.

I enjoyed this book, particulary parts 1 & 3. A common criticism and one I think I agree with is that you don’t really get a sense of an older person. Once we get to the training and the battles John is just a character we’re following and the fact that he has seven decades of experience doesn’t seem to play into it. I’d’ve thought at least in terms of the training we’d’ve see that oldies have less patience for their drill sergeant’s nonsense than your average 19-20-year-old.

I was also not a fan of the book’s treatment of the morals of war. The CDF seem to believe in Manifest Destiny and the one character who was given anything to say against this was also a character shown to be stupid by his actions. It’s true I suppose that there’s a constant tongue-in-cheek tone so how much we’re supposed to take any of this seriously is up for question. I’m told that this is dealt with again in the follow-up books. To be honest though I can’t see myself reading them.

7/10 – good decent old-fashioned spaceships and aliens SciFi.

TBR is down to 253 from 255 (this book plus a short from Nick Hornby – ok but not worth blogging about)

 

Categories
Accidental Diet diet L3 lesamy Less is More

The Accidental Diet – Week 9

So I’m back up a smidge but I’m not really worried. See normally I fast on Mondays, go for a walk and weigh myself after that. Due to a work lunch I have swapped my fast for tomorrow (but not the walk so I can at least rest tomorrow night – yay!). So I imagine I’ll hit a new low on some unofficial weighing tomorrow or possibly Wednesday morning.

Lost: -0.4lbs
Lost so far: 13.6lbs
Average Weekly Loss: 1.51lbs
Weight: 269.6lbs (19st 3lb)

Created by MyFitnessPal – Nutrition Facts For Foods

Categories
book reading reviews

The Amazing Maurice and his Educated Rodents – Terry Pratchett

One of the things I’ve always thought was very clever about the Discworld is that it’s an entire world. It’s big enough, and like the real world, diverse enough that it can cover virtually any type of story. Certainly you can parody gothic horror, classic fantasy, crime fiction and on and on. I mention this because sometimes the only connection between one Discworld novel and the next is that it’s set on the Disc.

The Amazing Maurice and his Educated Rodents is a bit like that. It’s the Discworld’s first ‘YA’ novel and it’s basically a riff on the idea of the Pied Piper, from the point of view of the rats (er and a cat called Maurice). For all that it contains talking animals and a little magic it could easily take place in a generic fantasy world rather than the Disc per se.

Maurice as I said is a cat and a talking one at that. He travels with a band of also talking rats and a ‘stupid-looking’ boy called Keith. Together they perpetrate a scam whereby they turn up at a town, create a very visible nuisance of themselves until Keith offers to play his pipe and lead the rats away, for a reasonable fee. This usually goes very well until they arrive in a town that already seems to have a very serious rat problem and some pretty effective rat-catchers. Soon Keith, Maurice, the rats and a girl they meet along the way are uncovering what’s really going on and it’s not pretty.

When I first started this book I was very aware that the language was aimed at a YA audience. However that faded fairly quickly as I became engrossed in the story. I will say that this is quite dark for a book for younger readers. It does have some disturbing scenes. However the humour is there as are the likeable characters.

I know I often complain that Pratchett has apparent difficulty ending a book and there’s really only two endings here, which is not that many compared to some, but I would have preferred a single show-down/climax and then a coda. That said I enjoyed the book overall. There’s some interesting thoughts here about leading/following, the need for and dangers of stories.

7/10 – a good story that works for old-not-so-YA-ers like ne.

TBR is up again to 255 (from 254) because I had a Christmas Amazon gift token to spend.

Categories
Accidental Diet diet L3 lesamy Less is More

The Accidental Diet – Week 8

Well it feels like it’s been a long time coming but I finally lost my first stone. IF is definitely a slower way to go but it also feels more sustainable. I was comparing my time to lose the first 14lbs with a couple of times from the past. I suspect that whereas the rate tailed off quickly with IF it will be more consistent. So – PREDICTION! – I’m betting on losing another stone by 4-mar-2013 (16 weeks).

Another thing to remember about Lesamy in particular is that I started this diet 2 ½ stone down from where that one started. Which means that I’d kept off those 35lbs (10% of my body weight) for over four years. That in itself is a very good thing – the health benefits of losing (and keeping off) even that amount are real.

But it’s mainly nice to pass a couple of milestones (the stone off and < 270)

🙂

Lost: 1.6lbs
Lost so far: 14lbs
Average Weekly Loss: 1.75lbs
Weight: 269.2lbs (19st 3lb)

Created by MyFitnessPal – Nutrition Facts For Foods

Categories
book reading reviews

Russell Wiley is Out to Lunch – Richard Hine

So this is my first book of the new year, and the new regime it represents. I bought it because it was part of Amazon UK’s “12 Days of Kindle” sale. (which if you’re in the UK you should check out, some bargains for some well-known and/or excellent books – you’ve got just over 24hours from time of posting to grab them).

Russell Wiley is Out to Lunch tells the story of a mid-level manager in a publishing company who’s trying to sell advertising on a print newspaper in the emerging online era. It was written in 2010 but set in 2006. Although I don’t think that matters, you just need to know that he’s working in a business that is in a market that’s in the process of being disrupted and no-one, least of all his superiors, seems to know what to do about it.

Alongside the comedy of corporate politics there’s the story of his home-life which consists of what looks like an increasingly fragile marriage. We get Bridget Jones’ style commentary on how many days it’s been since he’s had sex with his wife.

I definitely enjoyed this book and although it wasn’t laugh-out-loud funny it did make me smile quite a few times. The main character is interesting because he seems a little too competent at work (though stymied by those around him) and little too pathetic at home. Still on balance I did like him and I think you need to for the book to work. I could have done with a little more sympathetic view of his wife. Not that she was completely awful but I think we were supposed to come to a realisation of wondering why they were still together perhaps gradually rather than never really seeing it to begin with. There were some cute, touching and funny flashbacks to the beginnings of their relationship I suppose, perhaps they needed to be put earlier in the book.

The other irritation for me was the company politics was perhaps a little too convoluted and had too many characters. I suspect that this meant it was more realistic (the author has worked in publishing, I never have) but I felt like I ‘got it’ and didn’t need as much  characters/office-politicking as we got. Unfortunately this made a relatively short book feel longer.

The ending was perhaps a little too perfect in terms of wrapping things up nicely and the good ending happily. But then if the book was a little like a RomCom (and it was in places) then this ending fitted that genre fine.

7/10 – a fun read overall.

Thanks to said sale my TBR now sits at 254 up from 251.

Categories
reading

Reading Goals 2013

Every year I tweak my goals a bit – we’ve have 25 books, 6000 pages 2010 and 2011 and RED –  and this year will be no different. Except perhaps that it’s more than “tweak”.

This year I do have a number of goals but I also have a guiding principle and I’ve decided that my goals are all things to aim (note the “try to”s below) for but the guiding principle is what over-rules everything. So here goes…

Goals

  1. Try to read 40 books this year. 50 was a stretch but I managed 34. 40 will be another stretch but doable I hope.
  2. Try to reduce my To-Be-Read (TBR) list by 16. It’s currently at 251 so that will make a nice round 235.
  3. Try to finish all the books I start. May be harder and this goal is likely to be most in conflict with my Guiding Principle.
  4. Try to reduce my Goodreads “Currently Reading” shelf to 1 (or 2,3… if I’m genuinely reading them at the same time). Ever since I started using Goodreads I haven’t taken a book off my CR shelf unless I put it there in error or I finished reading it. This includes books I started, stalled on and later re-started from scratch. So essentially this boils down to “finish/re-read books I previously started”.

Those are the goals and the only goals. No page-counts, genres or other factors involved.

The Guiding Principle

In pursuing these goals I will abide by the following principle, especially when taking action which may appear to conflict with one of the goals (like abandoning a book, or increasing my TBR):

Reading is supposed to be fun, try to enjoy it.

Taking it a Step Further

Thinking about the Guiding Principle has made me wonder about being even more radical. Let’s just review how we got here.

This all started really because of  Harry Potter. Remember “Am I Crazy”? I wanted to re-read all the HP books before the new one came out. The need/desire to figure out if I was on track gave birth to my first tracking spreadsheet – crude and simplistic compared to what was to come. The next significant event was in 2009 when I realised that I’d only read 4 books in the whole of 2008. So “25 Books” was born and an improved version of the spreadsheet was created.

As 25 Books turned into 6000 pages I found that I needed/wanted a better spreadsheet to track what I was reading. This is essentially what I still use today, although even in the last couple of days I’ve been improving it further.

Now let’s be honest, there’s a geeky pleasure in the tracking itself. I like setting up the spreadsheets. I like watching the effect as I record time spent reading, comparing my pg/hr rate for my current book to previous ones or the overall average, working out roughly how long it will take to get to the next chapter, or next book, how far behind target I am and so on. All this is its own kind of fun but it’s not really about reading. Worse it’s possible it even detracts from or is displacement for actual reading.

It’s odd to think – it’s become so normal for me – but for the last four years whenever I’ve picked up a book to read I’ve also been making a note of how long I read for and how many pages I read. It’s not that big of an overhead and since I mainly read ebooks any device I’m reading on is automatically also a device I can record this info on. But the fact is that it doesn’t have that sense of just picking up and starting to read and maybe, just maybe it’s one of those barriers to entry that I was talking about in a previous post.

So here’s the idea: maybe I’ll give up the spreadsheet this year. I’ll still keep a note of which books I read, and I’ll certainly put up reviews but I’ll pass on the slightly obsessive recording part.

At least that’s the idea. I’d be giving up the geeky fun part in the hope of getting something else in return. That something I guess would be a sense of it being a lighter, simpler fun activity rather than a chore or an assignment. But there’s a part of me that will miss using my shiny new spreadsheet.

So that’s what I’m thinking but I’m still not sure if I’ll do it. Ultimately having fun whilst reading is probably more about choosing the right books.

Categories
book Read Every Day reading

RED? Not Really!

Phew!

So that was 2012. 34 books, nearly 11,500 pages. Not close to my target of 50/20000 but I did beat 2011 so maybe that target was always going to be a bit of a stretch. In the end I am satisfied with that result.

I have got a list of all the same stats I gave last year (score on the old ‘6000 pages’ system was 81, highest since records began) but I don’t intend to bore you with them (I can bore in other ways see! 😉 ). However it is worth mentioning that I only read 146 out of a possible 366 of the days of last year. So Read-Every-Day? Hardly!

But what I discovered is that it’s hard to read consistently unless you have a regular slot for it and when “life” occurs and makes you feel like not doing anything very much picking up a book and trying to throw yourself into it can be just a little too much effort. I do think if/when I made the effort I was rewarded but it’s that initial barrier to entry.

Anyway I think this just confirms what I sort of know which is I am a ‘binge-reader’ – I’ll plough through a book either when it’s so gripping that I can’t put it down or because I finally want to finish it and get on to the next one.

Although, this year I started 8 books that I didn’t finish which feels high. I’ve put most of them back on the list to be read this year.

Looking over my list of books for the year they are, as usual, an eclectic mix. I’d thought this would be the year of series/sequels but apart from Rivers of London/Moon Over Soho and Darkside/Finders Keepers it wasn’t. I only read book 1 of the John Carter books and never got around to reading the Ringworld follow-ups or even the second Dirk Gently book. I suppose I’m not counting Discworld – which is a separate category of its own – where I did read four books.

Anyway, no detailed stats, instead let’s have the…

‘Melissa’ Awards

Longest Book: Tigana, Guy Gavriel Kay (678 pages). Relatively short for a longest book, no 800-900 page monsters this year (though I did start The Stand).

Shortest Book: The Courtyard, Alan Moore and Jacen Burrows . Based on my 4 graphic novel pages=1 regular page rule this weighed in at a measley 12 pages.

Favourite Book: I’ll have to give this equally to Rivers of London/Moon Over Soho, Ben Aaronovitch.

Worst Book: Bet You Can’t… Find Me, Linda Prather. Sadly showing the downside of indie self-publishing.

Best Find/Surprise: I’m tempted to give this to Rivers of London again but I’ll say The Shining, Stephen King instead. It was a great read and not at all what I expected i.e. it’s NOT LIKE THE MOVIE!

Biggest Disappointment: Has to be Finders Keepers, Belinda Bauer. Took all the goodwill from enjoying Darkside and frittered it away. Also retrospectively spoiled the ending of the first book (a little). Special mention to News from Gardenia, Robert Llewellyn because I’d set my expectations too high and it was less of a novel and more of an eco-polemic.

Books to Donate to Charity (or delete from the digital archive): I don’t think we have a winner in that category. Even Bet You Can’t… is worth keeping. If we redefine this as Books I’ll Never Re-read then it would make more sense but I’d also never be able to narrow it down.

Book it Took Me Longest to Finish: Wool, Hugh Howey at 43 days. Not really the book’s fault which was an OK read but the aforementioned ‘life’ occurred during this book. If I exclude Wool on that basis then the next highest is A Princess of Mars, Edgar Rice Burroughs at 29 days.

Quickest Read: The Courtyard took a day but was very short (and already has an award) so the award goes to Protector, Larry Niven which also took a day.

Most Satisfying Read: I think in that I’d previously given up on it and when I finally finished it turned out to be enjoyable I’d have to say The Book Thief, Markus Zusak was the biggest achievement.

Book with the Most Anal Sex: I have to admit that I can’t think of any anal sex in any of the books I’ve read this year. A Quiet Belief in Angels, R.J. Ellory concerns sex crimes but I don’t think the physical specifics of the rapes is mentioned. I really don’t have the heart to look it up.